AI and society

OpenAI discusses a for-profit future that could give Microsoft more control

Maximilian Schreiner
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella standing next to each other, smiling into the camera.

OpenAI / Microsoft

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently informed shareholders that the company is considering changing its structure to a for-profit benefit corporation. This move could pave the way for an initial public offering (IPO) and potentially give Microsoft more control over the company.

According to a person who heard his remarks, Altman told shareholders that the AI developer is considering transforming its corporate structure into a for-profit company not controlled by OpenAI's nonprofit board. One possible scenario is converting to a for-profit benefit corporation, a structure already adopted by competitors like Anthropic and xAI, reports The Information.

The change could clear the path for a future IPO of OpenAI, which is currently valued at $86 billion. It would also provide Altman with the opportunity to acquire a stake in the rapidly growing company.

The Information states that discussions about the restructuring are ongoing and part of a broader consideration to alter OpenAI's structure while maintaining its connection to the original nonprofit organization.

Microsoft could gain direct influence over OpenAI through restructuring

The restructuring could align with Microsoft's interests. Last fall's drama surrounding the nonprofit board and Altman briefly made the software giant's investments appear misguided. However, Altman quickly regained trust and even briefly switched to Microsoft before returning to OpenAI.

According to The Information, some senior Microsoft managers have advocated for years to convert OpenAI into a for-profit company. Such a structure would allow Microsoft to gain more influence over OpenAI, potentially through a board seat and voting rights for shareholders, according to one of the managers. The relationship between Microsoft and OpenAI is already under critical observation by the European Commission.

Sources: