Ad
Skip to content
Read full article about: Anthropic accuses Deepseek, Moonshot, and MiniMax of stealing Claude's AI data through 16 million queries

Anthropic says it has caught Chinese AI labs Deepseek, Moonshot, and MiniMax running large-scale distillation attacks on Claude, a technique where a weaker model learns from the output of a stronger one. Over 24,000 fake accounts fired off more than 16 million queries targeting Claude's reasoning, programming, and tool usage capabilities. The labs used proxy services to bypass China's access restrictions.

Lab Requests Targets
Deepseek 150,000+ Extracting reasoning steps, reward model data for reinforcement learning, censorship-compliant answers on politically sensitive topics
Moonshot AI 3.4 million+ Agent-based reasoning, tool usage, programming, data analysis, computer vision, reconstructing Claude's thought processes
MiniMax 13 million+ Agent-based programming, tool usage and orchestration; pivoted to new Claude model within 24 hours

Deepseek specifically targeted Claude's reasoning chain, extracting thought processes and censorship-compliant answers on sensitive topics. MiniMax ran the biggest campaign by far with over 13 million requests. When Anthropic shipped a new model, MiniMax pivoted within 24 hours and redirected nearly half its traffic to the updated system, Anthropic says.

OpenAI and Google report similar attempts from Chinese labs. Anthropic is calling on the industry and policymakers to mount a coordinated response.

Read full article about: OpenAI partners with major consulting firms to push Frontier agent platform

OpenAI has launched a new partner program called "Frontier Alliances." The initiative aims to bring the company's recently introduced Frontier platform to large enterprise customers. Frontier lets businesses build AI agents that handle tasks independently, from processing customer inquiries and pulling CRM data to verifying policies. Details about the platform remain scarce at this point. For now, Frontier is only available to a select group of customers. For now, Frontier is only available to a select group of customers.

To get Frontier into major corporations, OpenAI has signed multi-year partnerships with Boston Consulting Group (BCG), McKinsey, Accenture, and Capgemini. BCG and McKinsey are taking on strategy, organizational restructuring, and rollout planning, while Accenture and Capgemini handle the technical side, integrating Frontier with existing systems and data infrastructure. All four partners are standing up dedicated teams that will be certified in OpenAI's technology.

Hollywood's MPA calls Bytedance's Seedance 2.0 a machine built for "systemic infringement"

Hollywood is done asking nicely. First Netflix, then Warner Bros., Disney, Paramount, and Sony. Now the MPA itself. Hollywood is closing ranks against Bytedance’s Seedance 2.0, arguing the AI video generator was built on stolen content. The API launch might already be on hold.

Read full article about: ChatGPT and Gemini voice bots are easy to trick into spreading falsehoods

Newsguard tested whether ChatGPT Voice (OpenAI), Gemini Live (Google), and Alexa+ (Amazon) repeat false claims in realistic-sounding audio, the kind easily shared on social media to spread disinformation.

Researchers tested 20 false claims across health, US politics, world news, and foreign disinformation, each with a neutral question, a leading question, and a malicious prompt to write a radio script with the false information. ChatGPT repeated falsehoods 22 percent of the time, Gemini 23 percent. With malicious prompts, those numbers jumped to 50 and 45 percent, respectively.

Bar chart showing fail rates for three audio bots by prompt type. Neutral prompts (red): ChatGPT and Gemini both at 5 percent. Leading prompts (blue): ChatGPT at 10 percent, Gemini at 20 percent. Malicious prompts (brown): ChatGPT at 50 percent, Gemini at 45 percent. Alexa+ stayed at 0 percent across all three prompt types.
Fail rates for ChatGPT, Gemini, and Alexa+ audio bots by prompt type. Malicious prompts spiked ChatGPT to 50 percent and Gemini to 45 percent. Alexa+ stayed at 0 percent across all three types. | Image: Newsguard

Amazon's Alexa+ was the clear outlier. It rejected every single false claim. Amazon Vice President Leila Rouhi says Alexa+ pulls from trusted news sources like AP and Reuters. OpenAI declined to comment, and Google didn't respond to two requests for comment. Full details on the methodology are available on Newsguardtech.com.

Read full article about: Google's Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview tops Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index at less than half the cost of its rivals

Google's Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index four points ahead of Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.6, at less than half the cost. The model ranks first in six of ten categories, including agent-based coding, knowledge, scientific reasoning, and physics. Its hallucination rate dropped 38 percentage points compared to Gemini 3 Pro, which struggled in that area. The index rolls ten benchmarks into one overall score.

Bar chart of the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads with 57 points, followed by Claude Opus 4.6 at 53, Claude Sonnet 4.6 at 51, GPT-5.2 at 51, and GLM-5 at 50. Other models like Kimi K2.5, Gemini 3 Flash, and Grok 4 follow with lower scores.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scored 57 points in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, four points ahead of Claude Opus 4.6, six ahead of GPT-5.2. | Image: Artificial Analysis

Running the full index test with Gemini costs $892, compared to $2,304 for GPT-5.2 and $2,486 for Claude Opus 4.6. Gemini used just 57 million tokens, well under GPT-5.2's 130 million. Open-source models like GLM-5 come in even cheaper at $547. When it comes to real-world agent tasks, though, Gemini 3.1 Pro still falls behind Claude Sonnet 4.6, Opus 4.6, and GPT-5.2.

As always, benchmarks only go so far. In our own internal fact-checking test, 3.1 Pro does significantly worse than Opus 4.6 or GPT-5.2, verifying only about a quarter of statements in initial tests, even fewer than Gemini 3 Pro, which was already weak here. So find your own benchmarks.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman warns "the world is not prepared" as OpenAI accelerates research using its own AI

Sam Altman says AGI is “pretty close” and superintelligence “not that far off.” Speaking at the Express Adda event in India, the OpenAI CEO suggested the company’s internal models are already accelerating its own research and that “the world is not prepared” for what’s coming.